Dangerous Drugs & Defective Medical Devices In The News

Read news stories on:


Bextra News Stories

FDA Statement on Celebrex, Bextra

Food and Drug Administration cites health risks in asking Pfizer to withdraw arthritis painkiller.
CNN Money - April 7, 2005

NEW YORK (CNN/Money) - The Food and Drug Administration asked Pfizer and other manufacturers to revise their labels to include boxed warnings of potential cardiovascular risks and gastrointestinal bleeding from certain arthritis drugs. The FDA also asked Pfizer to withdraw Bextra from the market.

Read more.

Another drug for pain off market

By Rita Rubin, USA TODAY

The Food and Drug Administration announced Thursday that Pfizer (PFE) has agreed to stop selling Bextra, a popular arthritis drug, because its risks outweigh its benefits.

The FDA also will now require a "black box" warning — the strongest warning — on the labels of Pfizer's blockbuster arthritis drug, Celebrex, and other, older prescription anti-inflammatory pain relievers such as ibuprofen and naproxen. The warning will highlight the drugs' risks of heart attacks, strokes and bleeding of the digestive tract.

Read more.

Bextra Pulled From Market

By E.J. Mundell, HealthDay Reporter

THURSDAY, April 7 (HealthDay News) -- The painkiller Bextra was pulled from U.S. and European markets Thursday following sweeping new U.S. Food and Drug Administration actions that mandate black-box warnings on all similar prescription drugs and labeling changes for similar over-the-counter drugs.

Read more.


Defibrillator Recall News

Guidant VENTAK PRIZM 2 DR and CONTAK RENEWAL Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillators

UPDATE: December 29, 2005, FDA MEDWATCH

FDA issued an update to the July and October, 2005, Preliminary Public Health Notification. The updated PPHN provides numbers of deaths and serious injuries for the three devices as of December 12, 2005. FDA's recommendations have not changed.

Read the full report.

Guidant Predicted Heart Device Failures, Report Says

December 25, 2005

(Dec. 25) - Officials at Guidant Corp. projected that as many as 15 of every 10,000 of its Prizm 2 DR implantable heart defibrillator might fail per year, leading to death in some cases, but did not tell doctors or regulators about the problems, according to documents filed in a Texas state court.

Read more.

Guidant Recalls 170,000 Pacemakers

By Peggy Peck, Senior Editor, MedPage Today, September 23, 2005

INDIANAPOLIS, Sept. 23-Guidant said it is recalling 170,000 of its Insignia and Nexus pacemakers. It was Guidant's fifth recall of pacemakers or implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) since June.

In a statement issued Thursday, the company urged patients with Insignia or Nexus pacemakers to consult with their doctors. The company did not suggest across-the-board explants of the devices.

Read more.

Guidant Recalls Thousands of Pacemakers

By ASHLEY M. HEHER, The Associated Press
Thursday, September 22, 2005

INDIANAPOLIS -- Guidant Corp. issued recalls or safety advisories for almost 170,000 of its top-selling pacemakers on Thursday following a two-week federal inspection of its cardiac unit.

Since June, Indianapolis-based Guidant has recalled or issued warnings about 88,000 heart defibrillators _ including its leading seller, the Contak Renewal 3 _ and almost 200,000 pacemakers because of reported malfunctions. Pacemakers use mild electrical current to speed a slow heartbeat; defibrillators use a bigger jolt to correct life-threatening irregular heartbeats. Surgery to remove and replace the devices is risky.

Read more.

Guidant Warns on Two Pacemaker Lines

September 22, 2005

INDIANAPOLIS - Guidant Corp. said Thursday it recalled some of its Insignia and Nexus implantable pacemakers because of failures, including nine cases requiring emergency hospitalization.

Since June, Guidant has June recalled 88,000 heart defibrillators - including its leading seller, the Contak Renewal 3 - and issued warnings about 28,000 pacemakers because of malfunctions. Analysts said those actions applied to about 20 percent of the company's products.

In its latest warning, the company said the failures had happened at low rates with the two families of pacemakers, but that the U.S. Food and Drug Administration had labeled as a recall its notice that some of the devices might permanently lose pacing output without warning. A pacemaker sends electrical pulses to the heart to correct a slow heartbeat.

Other reported failures include loss of telemetry and appearance of a reset warning message.

No deaths have occured because of the malfunctions, Guidant said.

The company said that as of Sept. 6, it had confirmed loss of pacing output in 36 of 49,500 Insignia and Nexus pacemakers, including seven that were detected by doctors before being implanted. No such failures had been found in devices shipped since March 2004, after a supplier made changes in the manufacture of a timing component, Guidant said.

The Indianapolis-based manufacturer of cardiovascular therapeutic devices reported telemetry failures in 16 of 341,000 of the pacemakers, as well.

Guidant Corporation Knowingly Endangered Patients' Lives

Deaths resulting from Guidant's delayed recalls are yet another reason we need the civil justice system as the last line of defense when corporate CEOs put profits ahead of safety.

Malfunctioning heart devices mean the difference between life and death for patients, yet Guidant executives only acknowledged defects with multiple heart devices when the New York Times was to publicly reveal the defects in an article the next day, according to the New England Journal of Medicine.

Read more.

FDA: Defibrillator defects on the rise

Friday, September 16, 2005

WASHINGTON (AP) -- Malfunctions in implanted heart defibrillators were on the rise even before this summer's massive recall by Guidant Corp., government and Harvard University scientists reported Friday.

About 20 of every 1,000 defibrillators implanted are malfunctioning, and defects led to 31 deaths between 1990 and 2002, concluded research sponsored by the Food and Drug Administration. The deaths represent only a fraction of the more than 400,000 defibrillators implanted during those years, but a troubling number nonetheless as regulators grapple with how to better ensure the safety of hard-to-replace devices.

Read more.

F.D.A. Had Report of Short Circuit in Heart Devices

By BARRY MEIER, NY Times September 12, 2005

Months before the Food and Drug Administration issued a safety alert in June about problems with Guidant Corporation heart devices, the agency received a report from the company showing that some of those units were short-circuiting, agency records obtained by The New York Times show.

But the agency did not make that data public at the time because it treats the information it receives in such reports as confidential. While the agency has a policy of reviewing the reports within 90 days, it is unclear when regulators did so within that time frame or how they first interpreted the information.

Read more.

Joshua Oukrop Died While Guidant Executives Dragged Their Feet

Joshua Oukrop, of Minnesota, was an active college student, studying to be a teacher. He loved to be active outdoors: hiking, snowboarding and bicycling. In 2001, at age 17 Joshua had been diagnosed with a severe case of the genetic heart disease, hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, which can lead to abrupt cardiac arrest. He had been falling down or fainting at sports practice and during marching band, so his father took him to a heart specialist because Joshua's older brother had been previously diagnosed with the heart disease. The doctors implanted an internal defibrillator, the Ventak Prizm 2 DR made by Guidant Corporation, that was designed to shock his heart if he went into cardiac arrest.

Read more.

FDA Says Defibrillator Defects on the Rise

By LAURAN NEERGAARD, The Associated Press

WASHINGTON Sep 16, 2005 — Malfunctions in implanted heart defibrillators were on the rise even before this summer's massive recall by Guidant Corp., government and Harvard University scientists reported Friday.

About 20 of every 1,000 defibrillators implanted are malfunctioning, and defects led to 31 deaths between 1990 and 2002, concluded research sponsored by the Food and Drug Administration. The deaths represent only a fraction of the more than 400,000 defibrillators implanted during those years, but a troubling number nonetheless as regulators grapple with how to better ensure the safety of hard-to-replace devices.

Read more.

Guidant Implantable Defibrillator Recall

Due to in ability to deliver an electrical shock during episodes of arrhythmia

FDA and Guidant Corporation notified health care providers and patients of the recall of certain implantable defibrillators and cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillators. These devices, surgically implanted in persons who have a type of heart disease that creates the risk of a life-threatening heart arrhythmia (abnormal rhythm), can develop an internal short circuit without warning, resulting in the devices' inability to deliver an electrical shock during episodes of arrhythmia -- which could lead to a serious, life-threatening event. There have been two deaths reported to FDA suspected to be associated with this malfunction. The devices affected by this notification are:

  • PRIZM 2 DR, Model 1861, manufactured on or before April 16, 2002
  • CONTAK RENEWAL, Model H135, manufactured on or before August 26, 2004
  • CONTAK RENEWAL 2, Model H155, manufactured on or before August 26, 2004

Read the complete MedWatch 2005 Safety summary, including the link to the FDA Press Statement.

FDA Updates Consumers on Guidant Corporation's Implantable Defibrillators

FDA News - July 1, 2005

As the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) continues to evaluate the safety and performance of certain implantable defibrillators manufactured by Guidant Corporation, the Agency has now classified the recalled devices. This additional information on the relative health risks of the devices will help patients and doctors take appropriate action, if necessary.

Classifications can fall into three categories, with Class I being the most serious. These numerical classifications are based on the probability that the device failure could lead to adverse health effects.

"Malfunctions in these devices can lead to serious consequences and it's important for patients to call their doctor for additional information and personalized advice," said Daniel Schultz, MD, Director of FDA's Center for Devices and Radiological Health. "However, it's also important to understand that in most cases these defibrillators work well and save lives."

Read the complete story.


Zyprexa in the News

LILLY ZYPREXA WARNING/CONFUSION

Daily Schizophrenia News Blog - February 25, 2005

This week Eli Lilly warned doctors about Zyprexa, Zyrtec confusion. Eli Lilly and Co. announced this week that it has changed the labeling on its antipsychotic Zyrexa to avoid confusion with Pfizer Inc.'s allergy medicine Zyrtec after some patients were given the wrong drug.

Read the full story.

ZYPREXA MAKER ISSUES WARNING FOR ELDERLY

Reuters - February 20, 2004

Eli Lilly and Co. on Friday said it has warned doctors that its schizophrenia treatment Zyprexa, its best-selling drug, significantly raises the risk of death and stroke in elderly patients suffering from dementia.

Read the full story.

RESEARCHERS WARN ANTIPSYCHOTIC DRUG MIGHT BE LINKED TO DIABETES

HealthNewsDigest.com - July 1, 2002

Research from Duke University Medical Center suggests there might be a link between at least one drug used to treat schizophrenia and the onset of diabetes, a disease widely recognized as one of the leading causes of death and disability in the U.S.

The drug, olanzapine (trade name Zyprexa), belongs to a relatively new family of medications called atypical antipsychotics, which are used to treat schizophrenia, paranoia and manic-depressive disorders. Other drugs in this class include clozapine, risperidone, quetiapine and ziprasidone.

The researchers found metabolic abnormalities ranging from mild blood sugar problems to diabetic ketoacidosis and coma in patients who had been prescribed olanzapine, most of whom were otherwise not known to be diabetic.

Read the full story.

DOCTORS ISSUE WARNING ON ANTI-PSYCHOTIC DRUGS

MSNBC News Health - The Associated Press - January 27, 2004

People taking certain drugs for schizophrenia, manic-depression, autism, dementia or several other psychiatric disorders should be carefully watched for signs they are developing diabetes, obesity or high cholesterol, four medical societies say.

Read the full story.

ZYPREXA LAWSUITS

Zyprexa-lawsuits.com

Eli Lilly's antipsychotic drug Zyprexa is one of the most frequently prescribed drugs for schizophrenia, and represents forty percent of the company's domestic sales. It may also represent a serious health risk for those prescribed the drug. As the Wall Street Journal reported in April 2003, an eight0year study of Zyprexa, part of a class known as "atypical," revealed that as of 2002, 288 Zyprexa patients had developed diabetes. Of those nearly three hundred people, sevety-five became severly ill, and twenty-three died.

Read the full story.

LAWSUIT LAUNCHED OVER ANITPSYCHOTIC DRUG

Edmonton Sun - March 8, 2005

Two Albertans who took the antipsychotic drug Zyprexa and then developed diabetes have launched a lawsuit…

Read the full story.

DISCOVERY LIMITED IN ZYPREXA CASE

Indianapolis Star - December 7, 2004

A federal judge has told Eli Lilly and Co. to be ready for trial within a year to defend its star drug Zyprexa against charges in federal court that the drug causes diabetes and related problems.

Read the full story.


Able Laboratories in the News

FDA ADVISES CONSUMERS ABOUT RECALLED DRUGS FROM ABLE LABORATORIES

FDA News - May 27, 2005

The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is taking action to ensure that the public is fully aware that Able Laboratories of Cranbury, NJ, is conducting a nationwide recall of all of its manufactured drugs (mostly generic prescription drugs, including drugs containing acetaminophen) because of serious concerns that they were not produced according to quality assurance standards. Able Laboratories has ceased all current production.

Read the full story.


Paxil in the News

2005 Safety Alerts for Drugs, Biologics, Medical Devices, and Dietary Supplements

Paxil (paroxetine HCL)
Paxil CR Controlled-Release Tablets

The FDA has determined that exposure to paroxetine in the first trimester of pregnancy may increase the risk for congenital malformations, particularly cardiac malformations. At the FDA's request, the manufacturer has changed paroxetine's pregnancy category from C to D and added new data and recommendations to the WARNINGS section of paroxetine's prescribing information. FDA is awaiting the final results of the recent studies and accruing additional data related to the use of paroxetine in pregnancy in order to better characterize the risk for congenital malformations associated with paroxetine.

Physicians who are caring for women receiving paroxetine should alert them to the potential risk to the fetus if they plan to become pregnant or are currently in their first trimester of pregnancy. Discontinuing paroxetine therapy should be considered for these patients. Women who are pregnant, or planning a pregnancy, and currently taking paroxetine should consult with their physician about whether to continue taking it. Women should not stop the drug without discussing the best way to do that with their physician.

Read the complete MedWatch 2005 Safety Summary.

If you or a loved one has suffered as the result of a dangerous drug or medical device, please contact a pharmaceutical litigation lawyer at Bisnar & Chase to discuss your case.
* First Name:
* Last Name:
* Home Phone:
* E-mail:
Comments:
*Anti-spam question:
  

Bisnar & Chase, LLP
1301 Dove Street, #120
Newport Beach, CA 92660



Lawyer of the Year

©2008 Bisnar & Chase, LLP - All rights reserved. California Pharmaceutical Drug Litigation Law Firm - Orange County Dangerous Drug Attorneys – Los Angeles Personal Injury Lawyers - serving the Southern California counties of Los Angeles, Orange County, Riverside, San Diego, San Bernardino, Inland Empire, Fresno, Ventura and Santa Barbara.

The Pharmaceutical Litigation Attorneys at Bisnar|Chase are licensed to practice in California and Nevada. We represent Pharmaceutical Litigation clients in other states through our associations with local law firms. Through the local firm, we will be admitted to practice law in their State, "pro hac vice", meaning "for this particular occasion". When in our client's best interest, we employ the local law firm (at no additional cost to our client) to assist us with routine court appearances and discovery proceedings to more efficiently pursue our client's cause.

California Pharmaceutical Drug Litigation Lawyer Disclaimer: The California dangerous drug, drug recall, medical device, drug side effects, pharmaceutical litigation, or other personal injury legal information presented at this site should not be construed to be formal legal advice, nor the formation of a lawyer or attorney client relationship. Any results set forth herein are based upon the facts of that particular case and do not represent a promise or guarantee. Please contact a California Dangerous Drug Attorney or Pharmaceutical Drug Litigation Lawyer for a consultation on your particular personal injury matter. This web site is not intended to solicit clients for matters outside of the State of California, although we have relationships with attorneys and law firms in states throughout the United States. The lawyer responsible for this website is John Bisnar.

Web Site Design & Marketing by SLS Consulting - Sitemap